Ensayo Espíritu De La LeyesTrabajos : Ensayo Espíritu De La Leyes. Ensayos de Calidad, Tareas, Monografias - busque más de 2.323.000+ documentos.
Enviado por CharlesOliver • 10 de Noviembre de 2013 • 6.963 Palabras (28 Páginas) • 72 Visitas
Lear, Tolstoy and the Fool
Tolstoy's pamphlets are the least-known part of his work, and his attack
on Shakespeare [Note, below] is not even an easy document to get hold of,
at any rate in an English translation. Perhaps, therefore, it will be
useful if I give a summary of the pamphlet before trying to discuss it.
[Note: SHAKESPEARE AND THE DRAMA. Written about 1903 as an introduction to
another pamphlet, SHAKESPEARE AND THE WORKING CLASSES, by Ernest Crosby.
Tolstoy begins by saying that throughout life Shakespeare has aroused in
him "an irresistible repulsion and tedium". Conscious that the opinion of
the civilized world is against him, he has made one attempt after another
on Shakespeare's works, reading and re-reading them in Russian, English
and German; but "I invariably underwent the same feelings; repulsion,
weariness and bewilderment". Now, at the age of seventy-five, he has once
again re-read the entire works of Shakespeare, including the historical
I have felt with an even greater force, the same feelings--this time,
however, not of bewilderment, but of firm, indubitable conviction that
the unquestionable glory of a great genius which Shakespeare enjoys, and
which compels writers of our time to imitate him and readers and
spectators to discover in him non-existent merits--thereby distorting
their aesthetic and ethical understanding--is a great evil, as is every
Shakespeare, Tolstoy adds, is not merely no genius, but is not even "an
average author", and in order to demonstrate this fact he will examine
KING LEAR, which, as he is able to show by quotations from Hazlitt,
Brandes and others, has been extravagantly praised and can be taken as an
example of Shakespeare's best work.
Tolstoy then makes a sort of exposition of the plot of KING LEAR, finding
it at every step to be stupid, verbose, unnatural, unintelligible,
bombastic, vulgar, tedious and full of incredible events, "wild ravings",
"mirthless jokes", anachronisms, irrelevaricies, obscenities, worn-out
stage conventions and other faults both moral and aesthetic. LEAR is, in
any case, a plagiarism of an earlier and much better play, KING LEIR, by
an unknown author, which Shakespeare stole and then ruined. It is worth
quoting a specimen paragraph to illustrate the manner in which Tolstoy
goes to work. Act III, Scene 2 (in which Lear, Kent and the Fool are
together in the storm) is summarized thus:
Lear walks about the heath and says word which are meant to express his
despair: he desires that the winds should blow so hard that they (the
winds) should crack their cheeks and that the rain should fiood
everything, that lightning should singe his white bead, and the thunder
flatten the world and destroy all germs "that make ungrateful man"! The
fool keeps uttering still more senseless words. Enter Kent: Lear says
that for some reason during this storm all criminals shall be found out
and convicted. Kent, still unrecognized by Lear, endeavours to persuade
him to take refuge in a hovel. At this point the fool utters a prophecy
in no wise related to the situation and they all depart.
Tolstoy's final verdict on LEAR is that no unhypnotized observer, if such
an observer existed, could read it to the end with any feeling except
"aversion and weariness". And exactly the same is true of "all the other
extolled dramas of Shakespeare, not to mention the senseless dramatized
tales, PERICLES, TWELFTH NIGHT, THE TEMPEST, CYMBELINE, TROILUS AND
Having dealt with Lear Tolstoy draws up a more general indictment against
Shakespeare. He finds that Shakespeare has a certain technical skill
which is partly traceable to his having been an actor, but otherwise no
merits whatever. He has no power of delineating character or of making
words, and actions spring naturally out of situations, Us language is
uniformly exaggerated and ridiculous, he constantly thrusts his own
random thoughts into the mouth of any character who happens to be handy,
he displays a "complete absence of aesthetic feeling", and his words
"have nothing whatever in common with art and poetry".
"Shakespeare might have been whatever you like," Tolstoy concludes, "but
(2013, 11). Ensayo Espíritu De La Leyes. ClubEnsayos.com. Recuperado 11, 2013, de https://www.clubensayos.com/Filosofía/Ensayo-Espíritu-De-La-Leyes/1238201.html
"Ensayo Espíritu De La Leyes" ClubEnsayos.com. 11 2013. 2013. 11 2013 <https://www.clubensayos.com/Filosofía/Ensayo-Espíritu-De-La-Leyes/1238201.html>.
"Ensayo Espíritu De La Leyes." ClubEnsayos.com. ClubEnsayos.com, 11 2013. Web. 11 2013. <https://www.clubensayos.com/Filosofía/Ensayo-Espíritu-De-La-Leyes/1238201.html>.
"Ensayo Espíritu De La Leyes." ClubEnsayos.com. 11, 2013. consultado el 11, 2013. https://www.clubensayos.com/Filosofía/Ensayo-Espíritu-De-La-Leyes/1238201.html.