Public administration theory: justification for conceptualisation

                         ACTIVIDAD 1

                            GESTIÓN PUBLICA

PRESENTADO AL DOCENTE:

ORLANDO ANTONIO MEJIA QUINTERO

[pic 1]

PRESENTADO POR:

SEBASTIAN FELIPE NEGRO ROMERO CODIGO 0106433

UNIVERSIDAD MILITAR NUEVA GRANADA FACULTAD DE ESTUDIOS A DISTANCIA (FAEDIS) PROGRAMA ADMINISTRACION DE EMPRESAS BOGOTÁ, D.C.

2023 -1

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION THEORY: JUSTIFICATION FOR CONCEPTUALISATION

Competent civil servants with knowledge of taxation, statistics, administration, and the military During the course of the 18th century, the need for administrative knowledge increased, including the social reform thinking of 18th-century Prussia. Lorenz von Stein, a professor in Vienna since 1855, is considered the founder of administrative science in all European nations. During von Stein's time, the science of public administration was considered an innovative form of administrative law in many respects, including the science of the sociology of public administration, political science, and public finance. EN Von Stein's critique of the science of public administration was an integrative science. He believed that public administration was the main practice, but the theory must be consistent, arguing that public administration science must work to apply the scientific method to find out.

In the United States, Woodrow Wilson was the first to regard management science as von Stein, largely thanks to an article Wilson wrote in 1887 ("Policies of National Importance from the Commercial Perspective; Comparative Analysis of Political Organizations and private and political structures; and certain an effective administration by the training of bureaucrats and the evaluation of its quality, they did not want to separate the two disciplines, but they believed that there could only be an administrative science that exceeded the parameters between the private and the public, initially the exclusion between politics and public administration was vigorously relativized, but the debate continued: public administration should be separated from politics.

However, any attempt to deny the political sphere in the study of public administration failed. Public management deals with the study of living organisms that develop in a given social environment but are politically determined. George Langrod published a rather secretive book entitled Some Recent Failures of Management in France Today (1961). The author cites, among others, the Swiss creator Herbert Loueti, who argued that the secret of France's narrative continuity lies in its government and not in any particular forecast, since its leaders even point to cases in which 1,247 super-inspectors of the state administration. Any discussion of public administration as a discipline and as an operational activity in France cannot be convincing if the reference to the Council of State is omitted. In fact, Langrod claims that the science of government is the result of the Council's dominance; Although Wilson is credited with being the father of the study of public administration, he simply reinvented a previously highly developed science in European nations.

Although the historical reason for studying public administration lies in political ideology, the truth is that the current managerial space goes beyond the original limits of government activity, the arguments about the role and responsibility of the State are conceptualized from a governance perspective.

Governance is the exercise of political, economic and administrative authority in the management of the affairs of a territory at all levels. Governance encompasses the intricate mechanisms, processes, and institutions through which residents and conjuntos articulate their interests, resolve their differences, and exercise their legal rights and duties. The article focused on the possibility of developing theories in the discipline of public management. Using examples from the pure sciences, it has been shown that the work of theories is accompanied by uncertainties and that the various assumptions underlying such theories are sometimes contradictory. Theorizing in the social sciences is as complex or even more complex than in the pure (or physical) sciences because a discipline such as public management is studied and practiced in a social and political environment. Although multiple theories exist in the subdisciplines of public administration, the probability of a unified theory currently seems out of reach.

...