EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies

EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies

Vol. 11, No. 2 (2006)

29

http://ejbo.jyu.fi/

Organizational

Identity and Trust

Abstract

This paper focuses on organizational identity and trust. The paper is being created from a theoretical point of view. Exploring concept and their interrelation is important and valuable scientific work with the purpose of better understanding their meaning and interrelation. This kind of conceptual and theoretical examination has an important task as a basis for theorizing and theory creation. Both identity and trust are multilevel notions. Both concepts describe an abstract phenomenon that is of growing interest in organization field of study. Despite of the conceptual ambiguity both identity and trust can be argued to be relative and qualitative by nature. In addition, they both are commonly seen as the property of a collective at the organizational level analysis. They both can be understood being affected by meanings, understanding and interpretation. They can also be understood being created and maintained in social interaction. There are several concepts that are related to the concept of organizational identity. In this paper we create a link between organizational identity and trust. The link can be understood by exploring organizational identity’s related concepts self-identity and identification. Both concepts are also crucial in understanding trust. In addition, in order to understand organizational identity’s and trust’s interrelation one must also explore the concept of commitment. Identity in an individual level, self-identity, can be characterized as individual’s theory of oneself. Identification in turn, has been defined as an individual’s sense of oneness or belongingness with an organization. Organizational identity can be understood as if a part of an answer relating to identification: To what is someone identifying themselves with? Commitment has commonly been characterized as the psychological strength of an individual’s attachment to the organization or as the relative strength of an individual’s identification with the organization and involvement in a particular organization. Trust in return is the key in creating greater commitment to an organization. Trust however, does not create identification. Instead we believe organizational identity affects the level of identification of individuals within organization which in return creates trust. In general the approach presented here encourages an enhanced awareness of interdependence and embeddedness of the concepts organizational identity, membership identification, commitment and trust.

Keywords

Organizational identity, self-identity, identification, trust, commitment

Anu Puusa

Ulla Tolvanen

Introduction

This paper focuses on organization identity and trust. The paper is created from a theoretical point of view. Exploring concepts and their interrelation is important and valuable research area with the purpose to better understand their meaning and interrelation. This kind of conceptual and theoretical examination has an important role as a basis for theorizing and theory creation. There are several concepts related to organizational identity. In this paper we create a link between organizational identity and trust. The link can be understood by exploring the concepts of self-identity and identification that are related to organizational identity. Identification is also a significant trust-making mechanism. In general the approach encourages an enhanced awareness of interdependence and embeddedness of the concepts. First, we explore the multilevel notion of organizational identity. Then, we present the concept of trust within organization. Finally, we conclude by building a bridge between these two phenomena.

Identity as a multilevel notion

Exploring identity has its origin in examining it at an individual level. The phenomenon has interested philosophers such as Socrates, Plato and Aristotelian in the ancient Greece. Concepts of identity and self can be perceived as the most important concepts in sociology and social-psychology. Identity at an individual level can be characterized as individual’s theory of oneself. Identity helps seek answers to questions like “who am I?” “Who do I want to be?” “Who could I be and what are my goals in life?” “How do I handle my relationships to other human beings?” “What is my place within society as a human being?” Thus, identity can be understood as referring to different meanings that individuals associate with themselves. Typically humans characterize themselves based on structural features of a group membership or with the help of characteristics that an individual him/herself associate with herself. In other words, identity is formed by different characterizations of oneself. It has also

EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies

Vol. 11, No. 2 (2006)

30

http://ejbo.jyu.fi/

been stated that identity illustrates the desire and need human beings have to interpret themselves as being part of something, a certain entity. Therefore, it can be concluded that humans have a natural desire to belong to a group. (Aaltio, 2004; Barney et al., 1998; Bernstein, 1986; Houtsonen, 1996; Huotelin, 1992; Rönnholm, 1999). According to the social identity theory, self-image is largely defined on the basis of how individuals are perceived and interpreted by others and how others bring out the impression they have formulated.

As time went by, researchers became interested in exploring the phenomenon of identity more systematically. They extended the research to identity and its illustration at a group level. Based on, for example the work conducted by Erickson (1964), it was discovered that not only does identity have an effect on how we perceive ourselves or how we categorize ourselves in relation to others, but it simultaneously creates team spirit between individuals in tight relationship and interaction with one another.

Finally, research was extended to organization level when Stuart Albert and David Whetten began their research at the University of Illinois in 1979. In the year of 1985, the very first definition of organizational identity was introduced. Albert and Whetten suggested that organization

...