ClubEnsayos.com - Ensayos de Calidad, Tareas y Monografias
Buscar

Environmental costs of cheap coal


Enviado por   •  22 de Septiembre de 2013  •  750 Palabras (3 Páginas)  •  494 Visitas

Página 1 de 3

The High Cost of Cheap Coal

Coal is plentiful—and polluting. Can an energy-hungry world afford to wait for this fuel to clean up?

The giant Gibson generating station is running flat out. Its five 180-foot-high boilers are gulping 25 tons of coal each minute, sending thousand-degree steam blasting through turbines that churn out more than 3,000 mega-watts of electric power, 50 percent more than Hoover Dam. The plant's cooling system is struggling to keep up.

But there's no backing off on a day like this, with air conditioners humming across the Midwest and electricity demand close to record levels. Gibson, one of the biggest power plants in the country, is a mainstay of the region's electricity supply, pumping enough power into the grid for three million people.

Angeline Protogere of Cinergy, the Cincinnati-based utility that owns Gibson, says gratefully, "This is why we're making all that power."

Coal-burning power plants like this one supply the United States with half its electricity. They also emit a stew of damaging substances, including sulfur dioxide—a major cause of acid rain—and mercury. And they gush as much climate-warming carbon dioxide as America's cars, trucks, buses, and planes combined.

Engineers are exploring technologies that could turn coal into power without these environmental costs.

The future is likely to hold many more traditional stations like Gibson.

In the developing world, especially EUA and China, electricity needs will rise even faster as factories burgeon much of that demand is likely to be met with coal.

Neither nuclear energy nor alternative sources such as wind and solar seem likely to meet the demand for electricity.

You hear it again and again: The U.S. is the Saudi Arabia of coal. About 40 coal-burning power plants are now being designed or built in the U.S. China, also rich in coal, could build several hundred by 2025.

Of all fossil fuels, coal puts out the most carbon dioxide per unit of energy, so burning it poses a further threat to global climate, already warming alarmingly.

With much government prodding, coal-burning utilities have cut pollutants such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides by installing equipment like the building-size scrubbers and catalytic units crowded behind the Gibson plant.

But the carbon dioxide that drives global warming simply goes up the stacks—nearly two billion tons of it each year from U.S. coal plants. Within the next two decades that amount could rise by a third.

Cleaning the unburned syngas is cheaper and more effective than trying to sieve pollutants from power plant exhaust, as the scrubbers at a plant like Gibson do. "This has been called the cleanest coal-fired power

...

Descargar como (para miembros actualizados)  txt (4.6 Kb)  
Leer 2 páginas más »
Disponible sólo en Clubensayos.com