Rubrica Presentacion Oral

Teacher Rubric: Oral presentations

 This is a sample rubric for teachers to assess students’ oral presentations. The criteria are based on the standards for LOTE and Communication.

 This rubric is designed to be integrated into a scoring sheet. A complete grading sheet typically has a scoring system attached to performance descriptors, and space for comments.

 The criteria, performance levels and performance descriptors are suggestions only and can be altered to suit specific requirements.

Criteria Below expected level At expected level Above expected level

Introduction of topic Topic introduced. Topic introduced clearly, and purpose of talk was made clear. Topic introduced clearly and in an interesting way. Purpose of talk was made clear. Outline of points was given.

Development of topic Some understanding of topic shown. Some links and connections made between ideas. Points are usually developed with minimum detail. Information is usually relevant. Good understanding of topic shown. Links and connections between ideas made clear. Information was relevant and expressed in own words. Points were developed with sufficient and appropriate details. A very good understanding of the topic shown. Links and connections between ideas made clear. Information was relevant and well expressed in own words. Points were well-organised and developed with sufficient and appropriate details.

Ability to engage and involve audience Some eye contact was made.

Techniques used to engage audience were minimal, or mainly ineffective. An interesting approach taken to topic. Speaker used techniques such as visual aids and props, anecdote, surprising facts, direct audience participation. Speaker monitored audience and adapts presentation accordingly. An interesting or original approach taken to the topic. Speaker used techniques such as visual aids and props, anecdote, humour, surprising facts, direct audience participation.

Suitability of presentation for purpose and audience Attempts were made to tailor the presentation content to the intended purpose of informing, interesting or persuading. The presentation content and structure was tailored to the audience and to the intended purpose of informing, interesting or persuading. The presentation content, structure and delivery were closely tailored to the audience and to the intended purpose of informing, interesting or persuading.

Voice: clarity, pace, fluency Presenter occasionally spoke clearly and at a good pace. Presenter usually spoke clearly to ensure audience comprehension. Delivery was usually fluent. Presenter spoke clearly and at a good pace to ensure audience comprehension. Delivery was fluent and expressive.

Vocabulary, sentence structure, grammar The vocabulary of the presentation was mainly appropriate for the topic. The presentation content was occasionally grammatically correct. The vocabulary of the presentation was appropriate for the topic. Sentence structures were usually correct. The presentation content was usually grammatically correct. The vocabulary of the presentation was appropriate for the topic. A variety of phrases and sentence structures were used. The presentation content was grammatically correct.

Pronunciation Pronunciation occasionally correct, but often hesitant and inaccurate. Pronunciation and intonation is usually correct. Pronunciation and intonation is correct and confident.

Cultural conventions for oral presentation Greetings and general presentation are not culturally inappropriate. Greetings are culturally appropriate. Questions are answered appropriately. Greetings are culturally appropriate. Gestures, stance and eye contact are appropriate. Questions are answered appropriately.

Use of visual aids No visual aids were used; OR

Visual aids were occasionally appropriate and related to the

...