EL ASESINATO DE JOPSE

September 28, 1994, Ciudad de México

 [pic 1]

José Francisco Ruiz Massieu is killed

was a Mexican lawyer and politician, member of the Institutional Revolutionary

He was killed at 9:30 a. m., on September 28, 1994 in Mexico City. Before the murder, Ruiz Massieu had been to a meeting with 180 elected deputies of the Revolutionary Institute that was made at the Hotel Casa Blanca, near the facilities of the PRI) of the Mexican capital. After that meeting Ruiz Massieu, about to get into his car, a young man of 28 years named Daniel Aguilar Treviño, shot him in the neck. After the attack he was transferred to a private clinic where he arrived alive. The bullet wound in the neck caused a great loss of blood causing his death an hour after arriving at the hospital. Aguilar Treviño was detained by security elements after a brief persecution. Aguilar's accomplice was a cousin of his name Carlos Ángel Cantú Narváez. The appointed is also arrested, although not present at the crime scene, but despite this, there was no evidence or charges against him.

Currently both are serving a sentence of 50 years in prison. This happens precisely six months after the assassination of the then candidate for the presidency of the republic by the same party, Luis Donaldo Colosio, on March 23, 1994

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Francisco_Ruiz_Massieu

The murder of José Francisco Ruiz Massieu[pic 2]

The details of this crime seem to be clear from the start. The victim, José Francisco Ruiz Massieu, leaves the hotel Casa Blanca, a few blocks from Reforma.

It is 9:22 in the morning of September 28, and moments before has concluded a political breakfast of the Institutional Revolutionary, in which 180 deputies participate. When approaching his car, "a lonely shooter" approaches Ruiz Massieu. He takes out a nine-millimeter pistol and shoots him point-blank from the left side of the neck. He almost certainly prepares a second shot, but the gun jams. The man flees on foot

The shooter is arrested shortly thereafter by a bank policeman. The authorities have him in custody at the same time that Ruiz Massieu is on his way to the Spanish Hospital, where he arrives at 10:06. Joseph Manso, an officer in the political section of the US embassy, ​​writes that according to "unconfirmed information," he needs mechanical assistance to breathe. 24 minutes later he is declared dead.

Officials present initial theories at the headquarters of the US embassy, ​​a few blocks from the White House. Ruiz Massieu had been governor of Guerrero. It may have been linked to violent acts - they do not specify which - in the state.

https://www.nexos.com.mx/?p=15697<3

Who ordered the murder of Jose Francisco Ruiz Massieu?

[pic 3]

20 years after the crime is still unknown who ordered and why the murder of Jose Francisco Ruiz Massieu

the homicide of the war politician, on September 28, 1994, shook the country for a second time in that situation, after the assassination of the one who was presidential candidate of the PRI

Today there are 4 people in prison for the death of the brother-in-law of former President Carlos Salinas Gortali:

Daniel Treviño, material author of the homicide

Fernando Rodrigez and Jorge Rodrigez, as co-author and complex

The Franciscan visionary zetia, La paca

"I remain a resentment in the accused towards the victim and between both there was no good relationship, so the exact motive of the crime is not affirmed"

http://archivo.eluniversal.com.mx/nacion-mexico/2014/impreso/quien-ordeno-el-asesinato-de-jose-francisco-ruiz-massieu-218927.html 

Assassin of José Francisco Ruiz Massieu wins protection, they will have to rethink and investigate if he was tortured

[pic 4]

 “The amparo does not imply that he be reléased”

With this legal benefit, Daniel Aguilar Treviño must receive a new sentence, less than the 50 years currently purged, for the murder he committed in 1994

The Third Collegiate Court of Mexico City granted him the amparo because he did not receive an "adequate defense", so the case against him must be reversed.

The magistrates ruled that there was a "conflict of interest" because the defense counsel in the preparatory statements was the same as that of the others accused of the crime and the statements of each affected the other

...