Airline Operations

Advisory Pamphlet

FSS-AOC-AP-002 01/2003

QUALITY SYSTEM PROGRAMME

AIR OPERATOR CERTIFICATION

1. PURPOSE.

This Advisory Pamphlet (AP) provides information and guidance material that may be used by air operator certificate (AOC) holders to design or develop a Quality System Programme acceptable to the Gambia Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA). The procedures and practices outlined in this AP can be applied to the maintenance, flight operations, and security aspects of an AOC holder’s organisation.

2. BACKGROUND.

Establishment of a Quality System is required by Gambia Civil Aviation Regulation (GCAR) 9.2.2.3. The development and implementation of a Quality System Programme will benefit both the certificate holder and the flying public.

a. Definitions of terms and a description of the basic elements of a Quality System are included in this AP. These definitions and programme elements are consistent with recognised quality auditing principles. Where appropriate, these terms have been tailored to conform to aviation standards and practices. Suggested procedures for documenting Quality System Programme procedures are also included in this guidance material.

b. The standards described herein are intended to help certificate holders develop their own Quality System Programme. The GCAA shall continue to encourage certificate holders to develop a Quality System Programme as a tool for continuously monitoring and evaluating practices and procedures. Public safety is enhanced if deficiencies are identified and immediately corrected when the certificate holder discovers them rather than when the GCAA discovers them.

c. Through surveillance and oversight, the GCAA verifies that certificate holders are upholding their responsibilities. GCAA inspectors are charged with the duty of advising and co-operating with each AOC holder in the inspection and maintenance thereof by the air operator. The Quality System Programme is intended to facilitate the inspector's advisory and co-operative capacity by providing a procedure for identifying and resolving safety related issues. The Quality System Programme also will help certificate holders develop formal compliance monitoring programmes.

3. DEFINITIONS.

The following key terms and phrases are defined to ensure a standard interpretation and understanding of the Quality System Programme.

a. Evidence. Evidence is a documented statement of fact, prepared by an air operator that may be quantitative or qualitative and is based on observations, measurements, or tests that can be verified. For the purpose of compliance monitoring, evidence should generally be in the form of written documentation or reports that support the programme's analysis and review. These data are necessary to substantiate findings or concerns and to enable management or evaluators to determine the root causes of any reported findings. Objective evidence generally comes from the following four elements:

(1) Documents or manuals reviewed.

(2) Equipment examined.

(3) Activities observed.

(4) Interview data.

b. Controls.

(1) Controls are the key procedures, responsibilities, and decision-making positions within an organisation, department, division, or functional area.

(2) As part of a quality evaluation, the controls of the area being evaluated should be verified and tested. In some instances, personnel performing the quality evaluation may have to first determine the features of a control.

c. Finding. A finding is a conclusion by the commercial air transport operator’s personnel that demonstrates non-compliance with a specific standard.

d. Concern. A concern is a conclusion by the commercial air transport operator’s personnel, supported by objective evidence, that does not demonstrate a finding, but rather a condition that may become a finding.

e. Inspection. An inspection is the act of observing a particular event or action to ensure that correct procedures and requirements are followed during the accomplishment of that event or action. The primary purpose of an inspection is to verify that established standards are followed during an observed event or action.

NOTE: The term inspection is defined in this AP within the context of quality auditing principles. It does not address or define GCAA inspections.

f. Audit.

(1) An audit is a methodical, planned review used to determine how business is being conducted and compares results with how business should have been conducted in accordance with established procedures. The various techniques that comprise an effective audit are as follows:

(i) Interview personnel.

(ii) Review documents.

(iii) Observe operations.

(iv) Select samples.

(v) Inspect activities.

(vi) Document results.

(2) As the above techniques show, an audit builds on the principles of inspection. The results of inspections assist in the audit objective of determining whether business is being conducted in accordance with established policies and procedures. During an audit, qualified personnel look for the existence of a systemic problem, but do not estimate the size of a problem. The results (findings and concerns) of an audit should be documented and presented to management. Management then decides how to address audit results.

g. Evaluation.

(1) An evaluation is an independent review of company policies, procedures, and systems. An evaluation should be a comprehensive and continual process that considers the following:

(i) Results of audits.

(ii) Overall effectiveness of the management

...